Study outcomes were reported according to descriptive statistics, without pooling study outcomes. Meta-analyses that reported associations between revascularization and clinical outcomes were included. Methods: A systematic search in Embase, Medline Ovid and Cochrane databases was performed to identify meta-analyses on PCI versus CABG in LMCAD. This study set out to review the extent of published meta-analyses on PCI versus CABG in LMCAD, and stipulates the need for “quality over quantity”. After the publication of two new trials, numerous meta-analyses on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) appeared in the literature. Background: Determining the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is a compelling topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |